From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Aim Rent-Car, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1996
227 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 28, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 6, 1995, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order dated April 25, 1995; and it is further;

Ordered that the order dated April 25, 1995, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

As the defense counsel showed good cause for his failure to timely settle an order effectuating the court's April 29, 1994, decision, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendants' motion to settle the order beyond the 60-day period provided by 22 NYCRR 202.48 (a) ( see, 22 NYCRR 202.48 [b]; Parisi v. McElhatton, 209 A.D.2d 495).

Moreover, as the defendant Moshe Lebovits was never served with process in this action, the court properly prohibited the plaintiff from proceeding against Lebovits in this action, without prejudice to proceeding against Lebovits in a separate action seeking identical relief. We note that the plaintiff has obtained jurisdiction over Lebovits in that action by court-ordered substituted service ( see, CPLR 308). Sullivan, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Aim Rent-Car, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1996
227 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Thompson v. Aim Rent-Car, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KERRY THOMPSON, Appellant, v. AIM RENT-CAR, INC., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 28, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 405

Citing Cases

Russo v. Russo

When a party is directed in a decision of the court to settle or submit an order or a judgment on notice,…

In re Village of Port Chester

The court denied the motion, finding that the petitioner had established good cause for the delay in…