Opinion
Case No. 11-12839
10-23-2012
Hon: AVERN COHN
AMENDED DISCOVERY ORDER NO. 2
On September 06, 2012, the Court entered a Memorandum And Order Granting Defendant's Motion To Disqualify Gerhard Reichert As Plaintiff's Expert (Doc. 30) And Dismissing As Moot Defendant's Motion To Strike Reichert As Plaintiff's Expert (Doc. 42) (Doc. 52). In so doing, the Court overlooked the scope of the relief requested by defendant in its disqualification motion (Doc. 30), to wit:
. . .or otherwise acting as a non-testifying consulting expert.
On October 17, 2012, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's motion to allow Reichert to attend depositions and otherwise consult with plaintiff. The Court at the hearing failed to appreciate the fact that in disqualifying Reichert to act as an expert at trial, it considered only the testimonial aspects of disqualification, and not the consulting aspects of disqualification. Given the reasons for disqualification of Reichert as an expert at trial, he is also disqualified from consulting with plaintiff as an expert.
The October 19, 2012 order incorrectly stated defendant.
The October 19, 2012 order incorrectly stated defendant.
--------
As previously stated, disqualification of Reichert as an expert does not mean he cannot testify as a fact witness if he has relevant evidence to offer.
SO ORDERED.
______________
AVERN COHN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, October 23, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Julie Owens
Case Manager, (313) 234-5160