From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson et al. v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 1, 1916
154 P. 1146 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 6506

Opinion Filed February 1, 1916.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance. Where plaintiff in error fails to file brief, and the record itself shows no error, the cause may be affirmed.

(Syllabus by Hooker, C.)

Error from District Court, Tillman County; Frank Mathews, Judge.

Action by Atha Thompson against C.E. Thompson and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.

J.E. Red, for plaintiffs in error.

J.E. Williams, for defendant in error.


Suit upon a redelivery bond. A demurrer was sustained by the lower court to the answer of defendants, and they declined to plead further and stood on the pleading, and judgment was rendered against them in the lower court, and to reverse the same an appeal was had to this court.

Petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on June 6, 1914, and plaintiffs in error have filed no brief to point out the errors, if any, of the trial court, and from an examination of the record we are unable to find any.

We recommend that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Thompson et al. v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 1, 1916
154 P. 1146 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

Thompson et al. v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:THOMPSON et al. v. THOMPSON

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 1, 1916

Citations

154 P. 1146 (Okla. 1916)
154 P. 1146

Citing Cases

Palmer v. Palmer

Conduct on the part of either spouse which is unjustifiable, and which grievously wounded the mental feelings…

First Evangelican United Brethren Church v. Comm

In well argued briefs, counsel for both parties have cited the court to various Oregon and other authorities…