From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thome v. Layne Energy Sycamore

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 17, 2005
Case No. 05-cv-01743-MSK-OES (D. Colo. Oct. 17, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 05-cv-01743-MSK-OES.

October 17, 2005


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on its Order to Show Cause Why Claims Should Not Be Dismissed (#4), filed September 22, 2005. In such Order, the Court directed the Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint or otherwise show cause why their claims should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on or before October 14, 2005.

The Plaintiffs have not complied with the Order to Show Cause. They have not filed an Amended Complaint or otherwise demonstrated that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over their claims.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Thome v. Layne Energy Sycamore

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 17, 2005
Case No. 05-cv-01743-MSK-OES (D. Colo. Oct. 17, 2005)
Case details for

Thome v. Layne Energy Sycamore

Case Details

Full title:GREG R. THOME, G T REED AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, JAMES E. MEINE, SCOTT A…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

Case No. 05-cv-01743-MSK-OES (D. Colo. Oct. 17, 2005)