From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomason v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 13, 1926
245 P. 829 (Okla. 1926)

Opinion

No. 14587

Opinion Filed April 13, 1926. Rehearing Denied April 27, 1926.

Error from District Court, Garvin County; W. L. Eagleton, Judge.

Action by W. T. Rawleigh Company against Charles Thomason and others. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and defendants bring error. Affirmed.

Cicero I. Murray, for plaintiffs in error.

Sam K. Sullivan, R. J. Shive, and Bowling Farmer, for defendant in error.


The plaintiff below, opposing attorneys, and the issues are the same, and the evidence tendered by the defendants is in effect the same as in the case of I. J. Gordon et al. v. W. T. Rawleigh Co., this day decided, ante, p. 235. The opinion and syllabus in that case are adopted as the opinion and syllabus in this case, and the judgment is affirmed.

Defendant in error in this case has asked for a judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond filed herein, in the event the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, it appearing that judgment herein was superseded by a bond on which S.E. Neill, J. B. Boone, W. H. Neill, and Emmett Neill were sureties. Judgment is therefore rendered against the said sureties on the supersedeas bond.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Thomason v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 13, 1926
245 P. 829 (Okla. 1926)
Case details for

Thomason v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

Case Details

Full title:THOMASON et al. v. W. T. RAWLEIGH CO

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 13, 1926

Citations

245 P. 829 (Okla. 1926)
117 Okla. 239

Citing Cases

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Riggs

It appears from the record that all of the indebtedness sued for existed at the time of the execution of the…

Rawleigh Co. v. Boyd Hill

instant case and all were decided in favor of complainant: W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. Leavors (Ala.), 95 So. 459;…