From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomason v. LifeCell Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
No. C-12-04463 DMR (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

No. C-12-04463 DMR

05-10-2013

SHELLEY THOMASON, Plaintiff(s), v. LIFECELL CORPORATION, Defendant(s).


ORDER SETTING HEARING ON

REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF

COUNSEL [DOCKET NO. 38]

On May 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed a state court form indicating that she will be proceeding pro se and that her attorney Steven Weiner wishes to withdraw from representation. [Docket No. 38.] Civil Local Rule 11-5(a) requires court approval for withdrawal of counsel. The court will construe Docket No. 38 as a request for an order permitting withdrawal, and will convene a hearing on the matter at 10:30 a.m. on May 30, 2013 at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. For courtroom number and floor information, please check the Court's on-line calendar at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click "Calendars - Judges' Weekly Calendars" link, then select Judge Ryu's calendar).

Both Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel shall appear in person, but not defense counsel. If defense counsel objects to its exclusion from this hearing, it shall file such objection, along with the basis for the objection, by May 17, 2013. Plaintiff's counsel immediately shall provide a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and shall also call Plaintiff to notify her of the contents of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Thomason v. LifeCell Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
No. C-12-04463 DMR (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Thomason v. LifeCell Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SHELLEY THOMASON, Plaintiff(s), v. LIFECELL CORPORATION, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

No. C-12-04463 DMR (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)