From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Nov 25, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-192 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2013)

Summary

finding that an inmate who proceeded to a subsequent step in the administrative process without affording prison officials with an opportunity to address his claims at the initial steps had not exhausted administrative remedies

Summary of this case from Crawford v. Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-192

11-25-2013

KELDRIC THOMAS v. DR. JEAN-GUY WOLFE, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Keldric Thomas, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Dr. Jean-Guy Wolfe and Joyce Morris.

Defendants Wolfe and Morris are employed by the University of Texas Medical Branch. Plaintiff's claims against federal employees were previously dismissed.

The Court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

________________________

Thad Heartfield

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Thomas v. Wolfe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Nov 25, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-192 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2013)

finding that an inmate who proceeded to a subsequent step in the administrative process without affording prison officials with an opportunity to address his claims at the initial steps had not exhausted administrative remedies

Summary of this case from Crawford v. Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr.
Case details for

Thomas v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:KELDRIC THOMAS v. DR. JEAN-GUY WOLFE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Nov 25, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-192 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2013)

Citing Cases

Crawford v. Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr.

However, inasmuch as his original grievance had been "rejected" at the first step of the administrative…