From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2014
No. C 13-02065 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2014)

Opinion

No. C 13-02065 JSW

03-25-2014

DAVID A. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu's Report and Recommendation regarding Defendant Wells Fargo's motion for attorney's fees. In her Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Ryu recommends that this Court grant the motion and award Wells Fargo attorneys' fees in the amount of $9,400. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), any objections to the Report were due by February 12, 2014. The deadline has passed and no objections have been filed. The Court has considered the Report, finds it well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Wells Fargo's motion for attorney's fees in the amount of $9,400.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2014
No. C 13-02065 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

Citations

No. C 13-02065 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2014)

Citing Cases

Juliet v. U.S. Bank, NA

Moreover, whether attorney's fees and costs are awardable is not dependent on whether Plaintiff attempts to…

Miller v. Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.

But courts have held in mortgage cases that prevailing defendants may recover attorney's fees where, as here,…