From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Ware

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 10, 2022
2:22-cv-0177-TLN-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0177-TLN-EFB (PC)

11-10-2022

PAUL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. WARE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 3, 2022, plaintiff filed his responses to defendants' requests for admissions. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff must, however, serve his responses to discovery on defense counsel rather than filing them with the court See E.D. Cal. Local Rules 250.2-250.4.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 3, 2022 filing (ECF No. 25) is disregarded.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Ware

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 10, 2022
2:22-cv-0177-TLN-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Thomas v. Ware

Case Details

Full title:PAUL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. WARE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-0177-TLN-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2022)