From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00063-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00063-WYD-CBS.

July 24, 2006


ORDER


This civil action comes before the court on Thomas' letter (filed July 14, 2006) (doc. # 35) (docketed by the Clerk of the Court as "Motion for Order to assist with the process of [Plaintiff's] case). Thomas asks an employee of the Clerk's of the court for "assistance in effectuating service of summons and complaint on the nine individuals listed as defendants" and "whether the filing of a Certificate of Review was required by the U.S. District Court in F.T.C.A. actions. . . ." Pursuant to the Order of Reference dated June 2, 2006 (doc. # 16) and the memorandum dated July 17, 2006 (doc. # 36), Thomas' letter was referred to the Magistrate Judge.

First, Thomas is required to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(a) and (b) by serving by mail on Defendants' counsel copies of all papers filed with the court, including an appropriate certificate of service. It is apparent from the letter itself that Thomas did not serve a copy of the document on the Defendants.

Second, Thomas' question regarding "whether the filing of a Certificate of Review was required by the U.S. District Court in F.T.C.A. actions . . ." asks for legal advice that the Court's employees cannot provide.

Third, Thomas' request for "assistance in effectuating service of summons and complaint on the nine individuals listed as defendants" is unnecessary. On April 24, 2006, the court granted service by United States Marshal. ( See doc. # 12). Waivers of service have been filed for 4 Defendants so far. ( See docs. # 31, 32, 33, and 34). All of the named Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss to the extent that they are sued in their official capacities. ( See doc. # 27).

Fourth, there is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the naming of fictitious or anonymous parties in a lawsuit. Watson v. Unipress, Inc., 733 F.2d 1386, 1388 (10th Cir. 1984); Coe v. U.S. Dist. Court for Dist. of Colorado, 676 F.2d 411, 415 (10th Cir. 1982). To the contrary, the Federal Rules provide:

"[e]very pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, the file number, and a designation as in Rule 7(a). In the complaint, the title of the action shall include the names of all the parties. . . ."

Fed.R.Civ.P. 10(a). This civil action may not proceed against Defendant "John Doe."

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the relief requested in Thomas' letter (docketed by the Clerk of the Court as "Motion for Order to assist with the process of [Plaintiff's] case) (filed July 14, 2006) (doc. # 35) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00063-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Thomas v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SAVOY THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, CALVIN L…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 24, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00063-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 24, 2006)