From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jun 21, 2011
1:10CV694, 1:07CR419-1 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 21, 2011)

Opinion

1:10CV694, 1:07CR419-1.

June 21, 2011


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on March 16, 2011, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence [Docket No. 35] is DENIED and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.

Date: June 20, 2011


Summaries of

Thomas v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jun 21, 2011
1:10CV694, 1:07CR419-1 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Thomas v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LEE THOMAS, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jun 21, 2011

Citations

1:10CV694, 1:07CR419-1 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 21, 2011)