From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Nov 1, 2012
Criminal Case No. 5:99-CR-45 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 5:99-CR-45 (CAR)

11-01-2012

MINNIE PEARL THOMAS Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.


ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. 403] to dismiss Petitioner Minnie Pearl Thomas's Motion for Sentence Reduction via Rule 60(b) [Doc. 402]. Petitioner has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. Having considered the Recommendation, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. Although Petitioner's filing is styled as a Rule 60(b) motion, it is in fact a Section 2255 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct. Because Petitioner has previously filed an unsuccessful 2255 motion [Doc. 377], the instant motion is precluded absent prior authorization by the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h).

Accordingly, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. 403] is hereby ADOPTED AND MADE THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Petitioner's Motion for Sentence Reduction via Rule 60(b) [Doc. 402] is hereby DENIED.

______________________

C. ASHLEY ROYAL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Thomas v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Nov 1, 2012
Criminal Case No. 5:99-CR-45 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Thomas v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MINNIE PEARL THOMAS Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

Criminal Case No. 5:99-CR-45 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 1, 2012)