From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Oct 3, 2012
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00332-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00332-MP-EMT

10-03-2012

HAROLD THOMAS, JR, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S TUCKER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 10, 2012. (Doc. 29). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus and a certificate of appealability are denied.

_________________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Thomas v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Oct 3, 2012
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00332-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Thomas v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD THOMAS, JR, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S TUCKER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Oct 3, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00332-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wright

While Defendant is correct that much of the supporting information is hearsay, officers may consider hearsay…