From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Tibbals

COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Apr 20, 2012
2012 Ohio 1904 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11CA119

04-20-2012

GARY THOMAS Petitioner v. TERRY TIBBALS, WARDEN Respondent

For Petitioner: Gary Thomas-A-601-988 Mansfield Correctional Camp


JUDGES:

Hon. Patricia A. , P.J.

Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J.

Hon. John W. Wise, J.

OPINION

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING:

Writ of Habeas Corpus

JUDGMENT:

Dismissed

APPEARANCES:

For Petitioner:

Gary Thomas-A-601-988

Mansfield Correctional Camp

For Respondent:

No Appearance Delaney, P.J.

{¶1} Petitioner, Gary Thomas, has filed an "Original Action in Habeas Corpus" as well as a Motion for Default Judgment. Petitioner alleges a writ of habeas corpus should be granted to release Petitioner from prison because Petitioner has not received proper jail time credit.

{¶2} According to the petition, Petitioner was sentenced to a term of incarceration in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case Number CR 08-507478. The conviction in that case was overturned by the Eighth District Court of Appeals. Petitioner was subsequently indicted in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case Number CR 10-545714. It is Petitioner's position he should be released because he should have been given jail time credit in Case Number 10-545714 for the time served in Case Number 08-507478.

{¶3} The Supreme Court has held habeas corpus does not lie to challenge jail time credit, "[Petitioner] had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise any error by the trial court in calculating his jail-time credit. State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton, 119 Ohio St.3d 350, 2008-Ohio-4476, 894 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 3." Hughley v. Saunders, 123 Ohio St.3d 446, 2009-Ohio-5585, 917 N.E.2d 270, ¶ I.

{¶4} Because habeas corpus does not lie to challenge the trial court's failure to grant jail time credit, the petition is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. By: Delaney, P.J.

Farmer, J. and

Wise, J. concur

__________________

HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

__________________

HON. SHEILA G. FARMER

__________________

HON. JOHN W. WISE

GARY THOMAS Petitioner

v.

TERRY TIBBALS, WARDEN Respondent

CASE NO. 11CA119


JUDGMENT ENTRY

For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, this cause is dismissed.

Costs taxed to Petitioner.

__________________

HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

__________________

HON. SHEILA G. FARMER

__________________

HON. JOHN W. WISE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Tibbals

COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Apr 20, 2012
2012 Ohio 1904 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Thomas v. Tibbals

Case Details

Full title:GARY THOMAS Petitioner v. TERRY TIBBALS, WARDEN Respondent

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 20, 2012

Citations

2012 Ohio 1904 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)