From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

THOMAS v. TEA COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1930
152 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1930)

Opinion

(Filed 23 April, 1930.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Clement, J., at October Term, 1929, of STANLY.

O. J. Sikes and G. Hobart Morton for plaintiff.

I. R. Burleyson for defendant.


Civil action by plaintiff, clerk in the defendant's grocery store, to recover for an injury sustained on 6 April, 1928, while he was cutting a piece of cheese for a customer with a dull, long-bladed and short-handled knife, which slipped and caused him to cut finger — later becoming infected — said knife having been used by plaintiff for the same purpose for about six months.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.


We perceive no valid reason for disturbing the judgment of nonsuit. The principles and authorities applicable and pertinent are discussed in Gaither v. Clement, 183 N.C. 450, 111 S.E. 782, and Wright v. Thompson, 171 N.C. 88, 87 S.E. 963.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

THOMAS v. TEA COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1930
152 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1930)
Case details for

THOMAS v. TEA COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:EARL THOMAS, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, E. G. McCULLOUGH, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1930

Citations

152 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1930)
152 S.E. 926