Summary
In Thomas v. Stewart (132 N.Y. 580) and Schnaier v. Nathan (49 App. Div. 298), where the authority of an architect employed by the owner as his agent and representative in the erection of a building was held to extend to giving verbal consent to deviations from the written contract, there was no limitation on the architect's authority.
Summary of this case from Langley v. RoussOpinion
Argued March 8, 1892
Decided March 22, 1892
Joseph F. Daly for appellant.
John H. Ferguson for plaintiff, respondent.
R.E. Prime for defendants, respondents.
VANN, J., reads for reversal, unless a stipulation for a reduction of the recovery is made, and for a modification if stipulation is made, as specified in the opinion.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.