From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Stevens

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Feb 3, 2023
Civil Action 1:22-CV-564-MJT-CLS (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:22-CV-564-MJT-CLS

02-03-2023

JIMMY EARL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN B. STEVENS, DANIAL WAYNE BOYD, KEVIN S. LAINE, and GREGORY PRATT, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Michael J. Truncale United States District Judge

Plaintiff Jimmy Earl Thomas, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. On January 9, 2023, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 4] in which she recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. To date, no objections have been filed.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 4] is ADOPTED. It is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SIGNED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Stevens

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Feb 3, 2023
Civil Action 1:22-CV-564-MJT-CLS (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Thomas v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY EARL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN B. STEVENS, DANIAL WAYNE BOYD, KEVIN…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Feb 3, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 1:22-CV-564-MJT-CLS (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2023)