Thomas v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Slattery v. State

    433 So. 2d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 8 times

    Both of these allegations were raised in a prior motion to vacate, which was denied by the trial court and affirmed by this court in Slattery v. State, 372 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). In his second motion the appellant has raised different facts to support his allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel which are not permitted under existing Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850. Therefore the order denying the appellant's motion is appropriate on the authority of: Thompson v. State, 410 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1982); State v. Piehl, 184 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1966); Mathis v. State, 419 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Hogan v. State, 388 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Neal v. State, 349 So.2d 844 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Thomas v. State, 234 So.2d 715 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). Affirmed.

  2. Dotson v. State

    299 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

    Oral argument has been dispensed with pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. The order appealed is affirmed on authority of Simpson v. State, Fla.App.2d 1964, 165 So.2d 195; Gysin v. State, Fla. App.3rd 1968, 205 So.2d 542; Thomas v. State, Fla.App.2d 1970, 234 So.2d 715; and Sparks v. State, Fla.App.4th 1972, 262 So.2d 251. MANN, C.J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.