From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 13, 1960
334 S.W.2d 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)

Opinion


334 S.W.2d 291 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960) John Kenneth THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 31877. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 13, 1960

[169 Tex.Crim. 370] Jack Hood, Borger, for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The disposition hereof makes a summary of the facts unnecessary.

The jurat on the complaint shows that the oath was administered to the affiant before and by John L. David, County Attorney, Hutchinson County, Texas. The information shows that it was presented by Cecil M. Pruett, County Attorney of Hutchinson County, Texas.

The record shows that John L. David was the assistant county attorney of Hutchinson County at the time he administered the oath to the affiant signing the complaint. Therefore he was not authorized by law to administer the oath to the affiant in the official capacity of county attorney, and for that reason the complaint herein is void. Art. 415, C.C.P., 12 Tex.Jur., 585, Sec. 258, Goodman v. State, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 279, 212 S.W. 171.

Because the information is not supported by a valid complaint, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 13, 1960
334 S.W.2d 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:John Kenneth THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 13, 1960

Citations

334 S.W.2d 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)

Citing Cases

State v. Pierce

" could not be inferred to mean Justice of the Peace and an official who had the authority to administer the…