From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 12, 2001
793 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

holding that when defendant files direct appeal, “the two-year limitation period within which to file a post-conviction motion does not begin to run until the appellate court issues its mandate on the direct appeal”

Summary of this case from Castro v. State

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-2121

Opinion filed September 12, 2001.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Lawrence Schwartz, Judge. Lower Tribunal Case No. 96-35347.

Roger Bernard Thomas, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney and Jeremiah Van Hecke, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.


Roger Thomas appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We conclude that the trial court erred when it found Thomas' motion to be untimely filed and declined to consider it on the merits.

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b) states that no post-conviction relief "motion shall be filed or considered pursuant to this rule if filed more than 2 years after the judgment and sentence become final in a noncapital case." The record indicates that Thomas appealed his final judgment of conviction and sentence, and that this court affirmed on September 1, 1999, with the mandate issuing on September 17, 1999. As the two-year limitation period within which to file a post-conviction motion does not begin to run until the appellate court issues its mandate on the direct appeal, Cabrera v. State, 721 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), and as this court issued its mandate in September, 1999, Thomas has until September, 2001 to file a post-conviction relief motion. Thus his motion filed on October 16, 2000 was timely, and the trial court should have reviewed the substantive claims therein.

If a defendant files a petition for supreme court review of the result of his direct appeal, the time period for filing a motion for post-conviction relief does not begin to run until the petition has been determined. Gaskin v. State, 737 So.2d 509 (Fla. 1999); Barkett v. State, 728 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to consider Thomas's post-conviction relief motion on its merits.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 12, 2001
793 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

holding that when defendant files direct appeal, “the two-year limitation period within which to file a post-conviction motion does not begin to run until the appellate court issues its mandate on the direct appeal”

Summary of this case from Castro v. State

holding that when defendant files direct appeal, "the two-year limitation period within which to file a post-conviction motion does not begin to run until the appellate court issues its mandate on the direct appeal"

Summary of this case from Castro v. State
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROGER BERNARD THOMAS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 12, 2001

Citations

793 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Castro v. State

As the charges under appellate case number 3D07-1458 were affirmed and mandate was issued on December 19,…

Castro v. State

As the charges under appellate case number 3D07–1458 were affirmed and mandate was issued on December 19,…