From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 6, 2018
246 So. 3d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18–185

07-06-2018

Corey THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Corey, Thomas, Jasper, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Corey, Thomas, Jasper, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We find merit in Appellant's challenge to the summary denial of claim 3 and, accordingly, reverse as to that claim. In all other respects, we affirm.

Claim 3 involves the contention that counsel was ineffective in advising Appellant to withdraw a motion to sever the murder charge from the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon charge. The trial court concluded that this was an obvious trial strategy that could be discerned conclusively from the records attached to the order. We disagree. On remand, unless other records exist that conclusively refute this claim, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing on claim 3.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 6, 2018
246 So. 3d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:COREY THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 6, 2018

Citations

246 So. 3d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)