From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 22, 2014
148 So. 3d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 1D14–0487.

07-22-2014

Elisha THOMAS, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Elisha Thomas, Jr., pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Elisha Thomas, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The portion of the petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel a ruling on petitioner's motion for postconviction relief is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The portion of the petition seeking to compel a ruling on petitioner's petition for nisi decree is also denied. See Sapp v. Crosby, 917 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“Because the circuit court has nothing before it on which to rule, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.”).

THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 22, 2014
148 So. 3d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:Elisha THOMAS, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jul 22, 2014

Citations

148 So. 3d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)