From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 26, 2018
No. 05-17-01342-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 05-17-01342-CR

01-26-2018

KEPHREN THOMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F17-16908-K

ORDER

On January 23, 2018, appellant filed four pro se motions with the Court: (1) a motion for preliminary relief; a motion to compel production of the clerk's and reporter's records; and motions seeking leave of court to file appellant's motions for preliminary relief and to compel production. On December 22, 2018, the trial court appointed counsel to represent appellant. Because appellant is represented by counsel, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

Accordingly, appellant's motions are DENIED.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 26, 2018
No. 05-17-01342-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEPHREN THOMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jan 26, 2018

Citations

No. 05-17-01342-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2018)