From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 3, 2016
NO. 14-16-00230-CR (Tex. App. May. 3, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 14-16-00230-CR

05-03-2016

KEITHRICK THOMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1454620

ABATEMENT ORDER

The trial court denied appellant's motion to suppress. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were requested. When findings of fact are requested on a motion to suppress the trial court is required to make them. State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 698-99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant's motion to suppress and have a supplemental clerk's record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this court. If the trial court is treating its statements during the hearing on the motion to suppress as findings of fact, the trial court is directed to include those findings in a supplemental clerk's record. The supplemental clerk's record is due by June 2, 2016.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 3, 2016
NO. 14-16-00230-CR (Tex. App. May. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEITHRICK THOMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: May 3, 2016

Citations

NO. 14-16-00230-CR (Tex. App. May. 3, 2016)