From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 24, 2015
178 So. 3d 549 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 1D15–2373.

11-24-2015

Anthony THOMAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Anthony Thomas, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Anthony Thomas, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the clerk of the lower tribunal has complied with petitioner's request for documents, the petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED as moot. If the response was in some way incomplete, as petitioner suggests is the case, this disposition is without prejudice to petitioner filing a legally sufficient request with the lower tribunal specifying the additional documents he seeks.

THOMAS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 24, 2015
178 So. 3d 549 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony THOMAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

Citations

178 So. 3d 549 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)