Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
ยง

Thomas v. State

225 Ga. App. 790 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Thomas v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Whitaker v. the State

    244 Ga. App. 241 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 15 times
    In Whitaker v. State, 244 Ga. App. 241 (535 S.E.2d 283) (2000) (Whitaker I), we vacated the judgment of conviction in this case and remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Whitaker knowingly and intelligently waived his right to a jury trial.

    Whitaker raises this burden of proof claim for the first time on appeal. That basis for objection was not asserted at trial and, therefore, has not been preserved for appellate review.Thomas v. State, 225 Ga. App. 790 ( 484 S.E.2d 797) (1997). 3. Whitaker claims that his trial counsel was ineffective before and during the trial.

  2. Ross v. State

    231 Ga. App. 793 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 41 times
    Concluding that defendant was not prejudiced by his counsel's failure to further impeach witness with certified copies of witness's felony convictions

    (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Thomas v. State, 225 Ga. App. 790 ( 484 S.E.2d 797) (1997). Judgment affirmed. Beasley, J., and Senior Appellate Judge Harold R. Banke, concur.

  3. Stewart v. State

    A97A118 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 27, 1997)

    Although Stewart moved to suppress the blood alcohol results on other grounds, "[a]n objection on a specific ground (or grounds) at trial waives any objection to that evidence on other grounds on appeal. Accordingly, all other grounds for objection, other than the specific grounds posed at trial, are not preserved for appeal." (Citation and punctuation omitted.)Thomas v. State, 225 Ga. App. 790 ( 484 S.E.2d 797) (1997). Stewart did not object to the blood test results as invalid or inadmissible under OCGA ยง 40-6-392 (a)(1)(A).