From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 31, 1998
707 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

holding that the court's failure to attach portions of the record which it relied upon to deny a claim precludes this Court from conducting meaningful appellate review

Summary of this case from Billens v. State

Opinion

Case No. 97-1599.

Opinion filed March 31, 1998.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. L. Haldane Taylor, Judge.

Hugh Thomas, pro se.

Robert Butterworth, Attorney General; and Trisha E. Meggs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant appeals an order denying his motion for correction of sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse the order because, although referring to the record of the proceedings, the trial court failed to attach the pertinent information upon which it relied to deny the motion and without such attachments, we are precluded from conducting meaningful review. See Corp v. State, 698 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand either for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief, or for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., and MCDONALD, PARKER L., Senior Judge, CONCUR.


Summaries of

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 31, 1998
707 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

holding that the court's failure to attach portions of the record which it relied upon to deny a claim precludes this Court from conducting meaningful appellate review

Summary of this case from Billens v. State
Case details for

Thomas v. State

Case Details

Full title:HUGH THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 31, 1998

Citations

707 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

Id. Under Kunkel, the appellant has stated a facially valid claim for relief. Nothing in the record on appeal…

Williams v. State

However, with respect to Appellant's first claim, the trial court failed to attach portions of the original…