Opinion
Case No. CV 08 5119 TEH
10-06-2011
RUDOLPH THOMAS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a SPRINT, SPRINT PCS and/or NEXTEL, Defendants.
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations FRED R. PUGLISI, Cal. Bar No. 121822 VALERIE E. ALTER, Cal. Bar No. 239905 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations JAMES J. MITTERMILLER, Cal. Bar No. 85177 FRANK J. POLEK, Cal. Bar No. 167852 Attorneys for Defendant, SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
FRED R. PUGLISI, Cal. Bar No. 121822
VALERIE E. ALTER, Cal. Bar No. 239905
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
JAMES J. MITTERMILLER, Cal. Bar No. 85177
FRANK J. POLEK, Cal. Bar No. 167852
Attorneys for Defendant,
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT
Dept: 12
Judge: Hon. Thelton Henderson
[Complaint Filed: November 10, 2008]
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, on June 9, 2010, the Court entered an order scheduling a case management conference on October 4, 2010 for control purposes, and ordered the parties to advise the Court in a stipulated request to continue the case management conference for not more than 120 days if the FCC matter has yet to be resolved by that date;
WHEREAS, on September 28, 2010, the Court entered an order continuing the case management conference to January 31, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. and ordered that the parties file a joint case management conference statement on or before January 24, 2011;
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2011, the Court entered an order continuing the case management conference to April 25, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. and ordered that the parties file a joint case management conference statement on or before April 18, 2011;
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2011, the Court entered an order continuing the case management conference to June 20, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. and ordered that the parties file a joint case management conference statement on or before June 13, 2011;
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2011, the Court entered an order continuing the case management conference to August 22, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. and ordered that the parties file a joint case management conference statement on or before August 8, 2011;
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2011, the Court entered an order specifying its preference that Sprint Solutions file a motion to compel arbitration after the FCC has concluded proceedings, and continuing the case management conference to October 24, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. and further ordered the parties to file a joint case management conference statement on or before October 10, 2011;
WHEREAS, the FCC matter has not yet been resolved as of the date of filing of this Stipulation;
The parties STIPULATE that the case management conference shall be continued to February 20, 2012 at 1:30 p.m., or any date thereafter convenient for the Court's calendar, unless the FCC resolves the matter prior to that date, in which case the parties will contact the Court within two weeks of the FCC's ruling and request a case management conference with this Court within the earliest reasonable time frame.
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
FRED R. PUGLISI
Attorneys for Defendant
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Meade & Schrag LLP
Michael Schrag
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RUDOLPH THOMAS and ASHLEE SMITH
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Case Management Conference currently set for October 24, 2011 is continued to February 27, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.;
The parties shall meet and confer and file a joint case management conference statement on or before February 17, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Thelton E. Henderson