From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 6, 2019
192 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2019)

Opinion

No. 96430-1

02-06-2019

Ted A. THOMAS, et ano., Petitioners, v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC; et al., Respondents.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Respondents' request for attorney fees for filing an answer to the petition for review is granted. The Respondents are awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondents should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

Supreme Court of Washington.
Feb 6, 2019
192 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2019)
Case details for

Thomas v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Ted A. THOMAS, et ano., Petitioners, v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Feb 6, 2019

Citations

192 Wash. 2d 1018 (Wash. 2019)
433 P.3d 818