From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 26, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-3016 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-3016 KJN P

12-26-2012

LEONARD BRYCE THOMAS, Petitioner, v. V. SINGH, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel or "pro se," has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Kern County Superior Court. Kern County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

_______________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 26, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-3016 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Thomas v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD BRYCE THOMAS, Petitioner, v. V. SINGH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 26, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-3016 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2012)