From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. S.E.A.L. Security Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 20, 2007
04 Civ. 10248 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2007)

Opinion

04 Civ. 10248 (JSR).

September 20, 2007


ORDER


On August 30, 2007, the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned discrimination and retaliation matter recommending that the defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff has failed to file any objection to the Report and Recommendation, and, for that reason alone, has waived any right to further appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985); Mario v. P C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002); Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, and, for the reasons therein, grants the defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismisses the complaint with prejudice. Clerk to enter judgment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. S.E.A.L. Security Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 20, 2007
04 Civ. 10248 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Thomas v. S.E.A.L. Security Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. S.E.A.L. SECURITY INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 20, 2007

Citations

04 Civ. 10248 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2007)