From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Scribner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2006
No. 1:05-CV-1471 OWW SMS HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:05-CV-1471 OWW SMS HC.

February 16, 2006


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. #4].


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

On November 21, 2005, Petitioner filed his petition. On December 16, 2005, Petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "an action may be dismissed by the [Petitioner] without order of court by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer. . . ." Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to the extent that they are not inconsistent with these rules, may be applied, when appropriate, to petitions filed under these rules."

At this time, Respondent has not filed an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Furthermore, the Court finds that Respondent will not suffer prejudice by a dismissal of this action.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition BE DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Scribner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 16, 2006
No. 1:05-CV-1471 OWW SMS HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Thomas v. Scribner

Case Details

Full title:KEITH THOMAS, Petitioner, v. A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

No. 1:05-CV-1471 OWW SMS HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)