From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't Transp. Unit

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
2:20-cv-1951 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1951 TLN AC P

06-13-2022

JIMMY RENAY THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION UNIT, Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 11, 2022, plaintiff's complaint was screened and the court found that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 11. As a result, plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. Id. at 8. More than thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, nor has he responded to the court's order in any way.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim and for failure to amend. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Thomas v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't Transp. Unit

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
2:20-cv-1951 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Thomas v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't Transp. Unit

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY RENAY THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 13, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-1951 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)