From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-40J (W.D. Pa. May. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-40J.

May 12, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2009, after plaintiff, Charles Scott Thomas, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until May 11, 2009 to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by plaintiff, and upon independent review of the record and the motion, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 73] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-40J (W.D. Pa. May. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Thomas v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES SCOTT THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEP'T OF CORR.; CUTSHALL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-40J (W.D. Pa. May. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Cyrus v. Stansberry

This allegation is not sufficient to demonstrate that he has been deprived of his basic human needs.See…