From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Orkin Termite Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 26, 1966
149 S.E.2d 85 (Ga. 1966)

Opinion

23492.

ARGUED MAY 11, 1966.

DECIDED MAY 26, 1966.

Injunction. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Whitman.

Parks Eisenberg, David S. Eisenberg, for appellant.

Kaler, Hicks Kahn, Samuel B. Lippitt, for appellees.


1. The cross petition of an employer seeking to enjoin a violation of a clause in the contract of employment whereby an employee, obligated to refrain for a period of two years after the employment terminated from engaging directly or through others in a competitive business within a specified territory which the parties agreed was being served by the employer, or soliciting any of the customers of the employer, alleges that the employee had violated this contract. The contract was definite as to time and territory and was reasonable. Hence it was not error to overrule the general demurrer to the affirmative answer as amended, and there is no merit in the enumerations of error complaining of this ruling. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Mills, 218 Ga. 340 ( 127 S.E.2d 796), and cases cited therein.

2. The special demurrers have been read and considered, and the amended answer is not subject to any of the grounds of criticism therein raised.

3. Upon the interlocutory hearing, evidence was introduced and allowed proving a breach of the contract, and it was not error to enjoin the breach. No good purpose would be served by setting forth even a synopsis of the voluminous record here.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED MAY 11, 1966 — DECIDED MAY 26, 1966.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Orkin Termite Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 26, 1966
149 S.E.2d 85 (Ga. 1966)
Case details for

Thomas v. Orkin Termite Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS v. ORKIN TERMITE COMPANY, INC. et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 26, 1966

Citations

149 S.E.2d 85 (Ga. 1966)
149 S.E.2d 85

Citing Cases

Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Harris

At the hearing it appeared without dispute that the parties entered into a written contract of employment…

Landmark c. Services Inc. v. Tarpley

The covenant sub judice restricting Tarpley within a twenty-five mile radius of appellant's office from…