From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Mullen

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 22, 2007
251 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-1716.

Submitted: October 18, 2007.

Decided: October 22, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00231-FDW).

Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Mullen, No. 3:07-cv-00231-FDW (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2007). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Mullen

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 22, 2007
251 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Thomas v. Mullen

Case Details

Full title:Randy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Graham C. MULLEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 22, 2007

Citations

251 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2007)