From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Mitchell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 19, 2022
2:18-cv-01615-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-cv-01615-RFB-VCF

08-19-2022

LACY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff(s), v. MITCHELL, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

Due to a clerical error, the Court inadvertently granted the [67] Motion for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Michael Humphreys. The Court finds that Mr. Humphreys is a resident of Nevada and employed by a Nevada firm. As such, he is ineligible to appear pro hac vice in this matter pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-2(a).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the [68] Order Granting [67] Verified Petition is STRICKEN from the Court's docket.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the [67] Motion/Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Michael Humphreys is DENIED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Mitchell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 19, 2022
2:18-cv-01615-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Thomas v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:LACY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff(s), v. MITCHELL, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 19, 2022

Citations

2:18-cv-01615-RFB-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 19, 2022)