From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 13, 2017
Case No. EDCV 14-2144-DDP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 14-2144-DDP (JEM)

06-13-2017

JAMAR LEVEAL THOMAS, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: June 13, 2017

/s/_________

DEAN D. PREGERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 13, 2017
Case No. EDCV 14-2144-DDP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Thomas v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:JAMAR LEVEAL THOMAS, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 13, 2017

Citations

Case No. EDCV 14-2144-DDP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2017)