From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Medina

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2007
No. CIV S-05-1243 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1243 MCE DAD P.

May 16, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 11, 2007 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Medina

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2007
No. CIV S-05-1243 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Thomas v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. MANUEL MEDINA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 16, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1243 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2007)