Opinion
April 20, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Goldstein, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the totality of the circumstances, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to allow the plaintiffs to serve an amended bill of particulars. Although the plaintiffs significantly delayed in moving for leave to serve an amended bill of particulars, there was no real showing of prejudice to the defendant Universal Reselite, Inc. (see, Scarangello v State of New York, 111 A.D.2d 798). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.