Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-591
05-11-2017
VINCENT THOMAS, Petitioner v. LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY, et al., Respondents
( ) ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 6) of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick, recommending that the court deem withdrawn the pro se petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Vincent Thomas ("Thomas"), upon notice of Thomas's election (Doc. 5) to withdraw his current petition to file an all-inclusive petition, and it appearing that no party has objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d t 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Mehalchick's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The report (Doc. 6) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick is ADOPTED.
2. Thomas's petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is deemed WITHDRAWN.
3. The court finds no basis to issue a certificate of appealability. See R. GOVERNING SECTION 2254 CASES R. 11(a).
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania