Opinion
No. 2:16-cv-2784-JAM-EFB P
05-24-2017
CLIFFORD BRENT THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. K. KAUL, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests an extension of time to file his second amended complaint pursuant to the court's April 28, 2017 order. He also requests again that the court appoint counsel. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time will be granted, but his request for the appointment of counsel is denied.
As plaintiff was previously informed, district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether "exceptional circumstances" exist, the court must consider the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Having once again considered those factors, the court still finds there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time (ECF No. 17) is granted and he has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his amended complaint.
2. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 16) is denied.
So ordered. Dated: May 24, 2017.
/s/_________
EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE