From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Hubert

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 15, 1951
208 Ga. 72 (Ga. 1951)

Opinion

17433.

ARGUED APRIL 10, 1951.

DECIDED MAY 15, 1951.

Rule for contempt. Before Judge Guess. DeKalb Superior Court. January 3, 1951.

William A. Thomas, in propria persona.

Russell G. Turner and H. O. Hubert, for defendants.


The plaintiff in error brought a rule for contempt against his client, who was plaintiff in a divorce and injunction proceeding, and against another member of the bar who had appeared for the plaintiff in the trial of that case. While the rule for contempt was entitled in the divorce and injunction proceeding, it was not predicated upon any provision of the final decree in that case, and all questions of divorce and injunction which the case originally contained had been disposed of by final decree before the present proceeding came to judgment in the trial court. No ruling upon any question involving equity or divorce being presented for review, the Court of Appeals, and not this Court, has jurisdiction of the writ of error. Jackson Electric Membership Corp. v. Echols, 207 Ga. 707 ( 63 S.E.2d 900).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals. All the Justices concur.

No. 17433. ARGUED APRIL 10, 1951 — DECIDED MAY 15, 1951.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Hubert

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 15, 1951
208 Ga. 72 (Ga. 1951)
Case details for

Thomas v. Hubert

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS v. HUBERT et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 15, 1951

Citations

208 Ga. 72 (Ga. 1951)
65 S.E.2d 155

Citing Cases

McClung v. McClung

The plaintiffs in error having executed, as sureties, a bond given by the defendant to the plaintiff in an…

Gates v. Gates

divorce judgment); Morgan v. Morgan, 193 Ga. App. 302, 303 (2) ( 388 S.E.2d 2) (1989) (where this Court…