From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 27, 1915
149 P. 839 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4405

Opinion Filed April 27, 1915. Rehearing Denied May 25, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Affirmance — Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

(Syllabus by Bleakmore, C.)

Error from County Court, Woodward County; Clyde H. Wyand, Judge.

Action by L.R. Henderson against Daniel Thomas. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Charles Swindall, for plaintiff in error.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on September 28, 1912. Neither parey has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 27, 1915
149 P. 839 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Thomas v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS v. HENDERSON

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 27, 1915

Citations

149 P. 839 (Okla. 1915)
149 P. 839

Citing Cases

Simmons v. State

On the 12th day of October, the order of dismissal was vacated, and the plaintiff in error given until…