From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Helms Mulliss Wicker PLLC

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Jun 19, 2008
3:07cv00052 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 19, 2008)

Opinion

3:07cv00052.

June 19, 2008


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment and Order (Document #31).

This Court understands Plaintiff's current motion to be asking the Court to grant relief from its April 3, 2007 orders (granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Document #21, and denying Plaintiff's Motion for Recusal and Motion for Sanctions, Document #22). Previously, Plaintiff appealed the decisions in those orders to the Fourth Circuit (Document #24), but the Court of Appeals affirmed this Court in its July 2, 2007 order.

Given the affirmation of the orders by the Fourth Circuit, along with the absence of any cognizable reason why this Court should reverse its previous decisions, Plaintiff's Motion for Relief is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Helms Mulliss Wicker PLLC

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Jun 19, 2008
3:07cv00052 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Thomas v. Helms Mulliss Wicker PLLC

Case Details

Full title:RANDY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. HELMS MULLISS WICKER PLLC, JAMES G…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jun 19, 2008

Citations

3:07cv00052 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Helms

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by…