From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Hayden

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Oct 1, 2021
No. CIV-21-00812-PRW (W.D. Okla. Oct. 1, 2021)

Opinion

CIV-21-00812-PRW

10-01-2021

NICHOLAS THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. RYAN HAYDEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

PATRICK R. WYRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on United States Magistrate Amanda Maxfield Green's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5), entered on August 30, 2021. The Court observes that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. The Court has also reviewed Magistrate Judge Green's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5) de novo and agrees with the reasoning and conclusions therein. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Mitchell's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5) and DISMISSES for improper venue Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. 1), without prejudice as to its refiling in the proper judicial district. Plaintiffs other pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Thomas v. Hayden

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Oct 1, 2021
No. CIV-21-00812-PRW (W.D. Okla. Oct. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Thomas v. Hayden

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. RYAN HAYDEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 1, 2021

Citations

No. CIV-21-00812-PRW (W.D. Okla. Oct. 1, 2021)