From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Hallmark Sys., Inc.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Oct 11, 2016
Record No. 0918-16-2 (Va. Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2016)

Opinion

Record No. 0918-16-2

10-11-2016

KARA NATONIA THOMAS v. HALLMARK SYSTEMS, INC. AND LM INSURANCE CORPORATION

(Brody Reid; ReidGoodwin, PLC, on brief), for appellant. (Imie Aisiku Harber; Law Offices of Christopher R. Costabile, on brief), for appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Present: Judges Decker, Malveaux and Senior Judge Annunziata MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Brody Reid; ReidGoodwin, PLC, on brief), for appellant. (Imie Aisiku Harber; Law Offices of Christopher R. Costabile, on brief), for appellees.

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. --------

Kara Natonia Thomas (appellant) appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission. She alleges the Commission erred in its application of the burden of proof to her impairment rating claim and in denying her claim for permanent partial disability. We have reviewed the record and the Commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Commission in its opinion. See Thomas v. Hallmark Sys., Inc., JCN VA00000868783 (Va. Wrk. Comp. May 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Hallmark Sys., Inc.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Oct 11, 2016
Record No. 0918-16-2 (Va. Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Thomas v. Hallmark Sys., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KARA NATONIA THOMAS v. HALLMARK SYSTEMS, INC. AND LM INSURANCE CORPORATION

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2016

Citations

Record No. 0918-16-2 (Va. Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2016)