From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Fry

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:19-cv-1041 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1041 KJM CKD P

09-28-2021

OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. J.C. FRY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 29, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 29, 2021, are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiffs motion that this action proceed as a class action (ECF No. 43) is denied; and
3. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings based on plaintiffs individual claims.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Fry

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:19-cv-1041 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Thomas v. Fry

Case Details

Full title:OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. J.C. FRY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1041 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)