From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Frederick Cnty. Gov't

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2012
469 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-2261

03-19-2012

SHAWN ANDRE THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FREDERICK COUNTY GOVERNMENT; THERESA M. ADAMS, Judge; JOHN H. TISDALE, Judge, Defendants - Appellees.

Shawn Andre Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:11-cv-02907-WDQ)

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Andre Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shawn Andre Thomas appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Frederick Cnty. Gov't, No. 1:11-cv-02907-WDQ (D. Md. Oct. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Thomas v. Frederick Cnty. Gov't

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2012
469 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Thomas v. Frederick Cnty. Gov't

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN ANDRE THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FREDERICK COUNTY GOVERNMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 19, 2012

Citations

469 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2012)