From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Felkner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1033 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1033 FCD GGH P.

April 4, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 29, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 29, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Thomas v. Felkner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1033 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Thomas v. Felkner

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT THOMAS, III, Petitioner, v. T. FELKNER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 4, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1033 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2007)